Do COVID vaccines have an effect on the menstrual cycle?

In a latest research posted to the medRxiv* pre-print server, researchers in america (US) estimated the affiliation between extreme acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination and menstrual cycle size in a big cohort of individuals throughout the US. They centered their assessments on menstrual variations as a result of kind of coronavirus illness 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine and the timing of its administration.

Study: Covid-19 vaccination and menstrual cycle length in the Apple Women​​​​​​​Research: Covid-19 vaccination and menstrual cycle length in the Apple Women’s Health Study. ​​​​​​​Picture Credit score: VonaUA / Shutterstock


By April 2022, over 11,000 ladies self-reported a menstrual-related concern to the US Vaccine Adversarial Occasion Reporting System (VAERS). The opposed outcomes included alterations in menstrual traits, together with cycle size, elevated bleeding, and menstrual irregularities. This anecdotal proof prompted researchers to enhance their understanding of those associations and inform clinicians in counseling ladies regarding COVID-19 vaccination.

In regards to the research

Within the current research, researchers used knowledge from Apple’s Girls’s Well being Research (AWHS) to guage the temporal evolution of the connection between COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual cycle size. They in contrast pre-vaccination menstrual cycle lengths, cycles through which a vaccine dose was administered, and cycles following COVID-19 vaccination. All of the research individuals have been over 18 years previous females dwelling within the US who had menstruated no less than as soon as, might talk in English, and owned an iPhone with a suitable iOS model.

These females supplied baseline menstrual standing together with their demographic particulars at enrollment. Following enrollment, the researchers surveyed relating to their menstrual well being month-to-month. The group from the Nationwide Institute of Environmental Well being Science,  Well being, Apple Inc, and Harvard T.H. Chan Faculty of Public Well being inquired in regards to the date of the primary and second vaccine dose, the vaccine kind, and signs within the 48 hours following vaccination from these individuals who obtained a COVID-19 vaccine post-September 2021. The individuals used the Apple Well being app or a third-party app to trace their menstrual cycle with related dates.

The group restricted the research evaluation to 4 cycles post-vaccination. They additional categorized vaccination as having occurred through the follicular or luteal part of a menstrual cycle to evaluate the affect of the timing of the dose inside a menstrual cycle. Since earlier research have advised a non-linear relationship between age and menstrual cycle size, the group categorized every participant primarily based on age for this evaluation. Additional, they stratified individuals as underweight, regular, obese, or overweight primarily based on their self-reported physique mass index (BMI). The research included months and years of the cycle to regulate the impact of seasonality and pandemic stressors.

Additional, the researchers included participant ID as a subject-level fastened impact in conditional linear regression fashions to estimate the covariate-adjusted within-woman distinction and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) within the imply cycle size. Lastly, the mannequin in contrast the vaccinated and post-vaccination cycles of every collaborating feminine to their pre-vaccine cycles (management cycles).

As per the Worldwide Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, a menstrual cycle occurring at greater than 38 days is an extended cycle. The group used generalized estimating equations (GEE) to suit a logistic regression mannequin that computed odds ratio (ORs) and 95% CI for the affiliation between COVID-19 vaccination and the probability of an extended cycle in vaccinated individuals in contrast with unvaccinated individuals. Lastly, the group used two sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of their major evaluation.

Research findings

The present research evaluation coated 128,094 menstrual cycles of 9,652 individuals, who recorded 13 cycles on common. Furthermore, the typical commonplace deviation in cycle size for any particular person feminine was 4.2 days. Of all of the vaccinated females, 55%, 37%, and seven% had obtained the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson/Janssen (J&J) vaccine, respectively.

All vaccinated females had solely barely longer menstrual cycles than their pre-vaccination cycles. On common, the only dose of the J&J vaccine elevated the cycle size by 1.26 days. Additional, the noticed improve within the common size of menstrual cycles was negligible and non-persistent primarily based on the variety of vaccine doses (0.50 vs. 0.39 days after the primary and second vaccine doses). Furthermore, menstrual cycle lengths returned to common pre-vaccination values inside 0.14 days to -0.25 days between the primary to fourth menstrual cycle following vaccination.

Nevertheless, the authors noticed an affiliation between vaccination and the menstrual cycle part(s). Subsequently, vaccine doses obtained within the follicular part elevated the imply cycle size noticed within the preliminary research outcomes. Additionally, when a feminine obtained the second vaccine dose within the luteal part, the next menstrual cycle, on common, was shorter. The covariate-adjusted mixed-effects mannequin and the GEE outcomes didn’t fluctuate a lot between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. The imply menstrual cycle size was 0.24 days for the previous, and ORs for the GEE was 1.20.


The present work confirmed that COVID-19 vaccination was protected for menstruating females, with no opposed impact on fertility. Though vaccination barely elevated menstrual cycle size; but, it remained properly inside the pure variability noticed within the research inhabitants. The alteration in cycle size following vaccination was doubtless as a consequence of vaccine doses obtained within the follicular part of the menstrual cycle. Nevertheless, these modifications diminished step by step with every cycle, and none continued over time. To conclude, because the noticed modifications within the menstrual cycle have been solely minor and transient, they need to not discourage females from taking the COVID-19 vaccination.

*Vital discover

medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific studies that aren’t peer-reviewed and, subsequently, shouldn’t be considered conclusive, information scientific follow/health-related conduct, or handled as established info.

Journal reference:



Leave a Reply