Gene expression regulation by N6-methyladenosine

A latest examine printed in Molecular Cell reviewed the management of gene expression by N6-methyladenosine (m6A), a modified nucleotide within the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA).

Study: Hidden codes in mRNA: Control of gene expression by m6A. Image Credit: nobeastsofierce/Shutterstock
Examine: Hidden codes in mRNA: Control of gene expression by m6A. Picture Credit score: nobeastsofierce/Shutterstock


The central focus of exploring regulatory parts in mRNA has been on sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that affect mRNA stability, translation, and splicing. Alternatively, some regulatory parts are encoded by chemical modifications of mRNA nucleotides. m6A is essentially the most considerable modified mRNA nucleotide, additionally present in small nuclear RNA (snRNA) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA).

Recognized as an mRNA part within the Seventies, the curiosity in finding out pathological and practical options of m6A was sparked by one examine in Arabidopsis, the place depletion of an m6A-synthesizing protein homolog resulted in developmental defects. Over the previous decade, a number of breakthroughs have been made relating to the mechanisms and features of m6A. Within the current overview, researchers mentioned the present views of m6A and the excellent questions on its regulatory pathway.

Dynamics of m6A

Mapping analyses revealed that gene structure, i.e., the distribution and size of introns and exons in a gene, is linked to mRNA methylation patterns. One examine famous disproportionate enrichment of mRNA methylation in areas of transcripts equivalent to lengthy inner exons. In addition to, m6A enrichment can be noticed close to the cease codon.

Though the cease codon is unlikely to set off the formation of m6A within the nucleus as a result of they’re acknowledged solely by ribosomes within the cytosol, this (characteristic) may be as a result of terminal exon-exon junction, often close to the termination codon. Whereas m6A is described as a dynamic modification, proof for its dynamics is restricted. A possible caveat for this may be the totally different interpretations of the time period ‘dynamic.’

As an example, dynamic may imply the power of m6A to look on a transcript, disappear, reappear, and be eliminated a number of occasions within the lifespan of a single mRNA molecule. That is unlikely provided that methylation happens as soon as and demethylation if it happens, can be restricted to the nucleus. m6A acquires a sample within the nucleus, which is retained all through the following life within the cytosol. Thus, m6A will not be dynamic on this respect.

Nuclear and cytoplasmic m6A readers

The modified nucleotide exerts its results by binding to reader proteins such because the YTH area containing 1 (YTHDC1 or DC1) within the nucleus, and YTH domain-containing household protein 1 (YTHDF1 or DF1), YTHDF2 (DF2), and YTHDF3 (DF3) within the cytosol. YTHDF1, 2, and three are paralogs with excessive amino acid identification and primarily comprise low-complexity area areas. The presence of considerable low-complexity area sequences in YTHDF1, 2, and three proteins is in keeping with these proteins’ functioning in intracellular condensates.

Latest reviews indicated that the DF proteins are enriched in stress granules, processing (P)-bodies, and different condensates and that they bear section separation upon interplay with poly-methylated RNAs. Therefore, the features and regulation of YTHDF are linked to condensate biology. Till just lately, every DF protein was thought to bind distinctive subsets of m6A websites. Nonetheless, the current examine’s authors beforehand demonstrated that the DF paralogs bind to all m6A websites equivalently.

Redundancy within the features of DF paralogs

As with the features of DF paralogs, the prevailing notion was that DF2 promotes mRNA degradation whereas DF1 and three improve translation. Extra just lately, DF protein features have been essentially revised. Mounting proof indicated that DF1 doesn’t improve m6A RNA translation and that DF paralogs perform redundantly, resulting in mRNA degradation.

Notably, regardless of the practical redundancy, the DF paralogs aren’t totally interchangeable and present variations within the low-complexity domains. These variations may result in differential section separation conduct and regulation by post-translational (PTM) modifications.

m6A and epigenetic regulation

DC1 regulates the features of m6A within the nucleus, and roughly all nuclear RNA processing occasions are linked to DC1 and m6A, together with polyadenylation website choice, splicing, nuclear RNA degradation, nuclear export, and epigenetic regulation. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) represent one of many most important DC1 targets, and research have noticed that depleted DC1 ranges may affect nuclear structure and P-bodies.

It has been proven that DF proteins promoted m6A-mediated mRNA degradation proportional to the variety of m6A websites within the transcript. Additional, DC1 may also be concerned within the regulation of epigenetic silencing. DC1-bound m6A websites on X inactive particular transcript (XIST) promotes gene silencing.

DC1 has been implicated within the silencing of retrotransposons and endogenous retroviruses. Contrastingly, gene activation has additionally been noticed with DC1 and m6A. DC1 was proven to advertise demethylation of histone 3 lysine 9 (H3K9) and improve the expression of about 30% of m6A-containing transcripts. Nonetheless, it’s unclear how DC1 promotes or suppresses H3K9 methylation.

Concluding comment

Though it’s understood that m6A predominantly mediates the degradation of m6A-marked mRNAs, the nuclear results of m6A, significantly within the gentle of contradicting findings relating to epigenetic regulation and m6A, require extra analysis sooner or later.

Journal reference:



Leave a Reply